Autism, Stress and Creativity. 2009 Original hypothesis, notes, references

 A Systems Approach to 

Understanding Spectrum Disorders.

Lori Hogenkamp BA Psychology


I’m an adult with what recently has come to my understanding to having Asperger’s or on the autism spectrum. As a child, loud noises would often make me “sick” and going to parties, mall or weddings would exhaust and overwhelm me for reasons I could never explain. In college I experienced what resembled an “autistic-state”, shaking and flapping of my hands, constant sugar and junk food cravings, and finally regressed to a point that I could not process language or put together sentences. After recovery from this state, I went on to finish my degree in psychology with a concentration in neuroscience,  a combination called psychoneuroimmunology. I’ve been fascinated ever since by human perception, information processing, the brain, general health and how nutrition affects cognition.  I’ve spent a lifetime wondering why I had nothing necessarily wrong with me but something not quite right.  

An experience on the spectrum

I have always struggled to write. That ability to interject while staying on task can be difficult to overwhelming for me. It is my understanding this struggle with communication is part of a subset of those on the spectrum being considered “systems or pattern thinkers” (Grandin 2005, Dawson 2007, Hayashi 2007) and the ability to think in many directions at once (Oberman 2009) does not lend itself well to thinking in a linear clear fashion.

I experienced this type of labyrinth-thinking in geometry, I could think of many ways to solve a single geometry problem. My mind would go off in many directions, building these labyrinths, and finally coalescing on a single solution. I could not write my work out, because I would literally do the problem in five different ways at once. And of course algebra, with its linear formulations, was extremely difficult for me. Writing out  formulas in their ordered and direct fashion.

While doing research in college, I was able to give unique insight and help develop the hypothesis and exquisitely control for variables. I could give answers to critiques and provide answers that in many ways dumbfounded my peers. But I could not at all do what many considered the easy part, the writing. My co-researchers would chuckle at this seemingly confounding lack of skills in stark contrast to my other abilities, that I could not do something that was so simple to most. This experience is similar to the fact I would almost indubitably almost fail sociology courses, the “gimmie” courses as most of my peers saw them. There were always too many options for me, too many variables, too many possibilities. I liked math and science. Real answers, real solutions. “People”-skills always seemed so arbitrary, based on history, culture, how popular was the kid it was coming from, the answer would change based on too many factors involved and the possibilities would be dependent on too many unknowns….science skills don’t seem to make very good social skills.

Too much Information

I can remember in the fourth grade wondering how people made social decisions.   How in the world could they decide the “correct” thing to say when there are so many possibilities?  People would advise me to listen to your gut.  I would say…”uh”, which voice is that? (Brierley 2008) I do believe this is lowered latent inhibition.   My brain doesn’t filter out all but the essential information it is exposed to.   It has many options available and I pick up on details that no one else seems to see (Vital 2009).  I agree with the researchers from Harvard and Toronto (Peterson 2000), stating this allows for creative/scientific thinking, but less social skills and a greater susceptibility to what we once thought of as “mental illnesses”. 

“Scientists have wondered for a long time why madness and creativity seem linked,” says Carson.  “It appears likely that low levels of latent inhibition and exceptional flexibility in thought might predispose to mental illness under some conditions and to creative accomplishment under others.” (Peterson 2000)

Leo Kanner, who first recognized Autism in 1943, stated “For the most part, the parents, grandparents, and collaterals are persons strongly preoccupied with abstractions of a scientific, literary, or artistic nature…”

Throughout our history, we have always had communities and villages with a core majority group of stabilizing, social, community-oriented individuals, and we always had the periphery minds, the outliers, those who needed to take in more information from their environments. The hyper-aware and vigilant; the innovators, the explorers, the protectors, the athletes, the hunters, the scientists, the geeks, the artists and the creative.  For these social and personality differences, this evolutionary process required those populations to process sensory information slightly differently and their brain architecture to be slightly different (Molina 2009) in order to excel at protecting, guiding, finding new places, observing wildlife, and those willing to explore the world around them. And there is evidence to suggest that there are slight changes in brain structure that reflect the types of social interactions and environmental stimuli. And that the roles of individuals in a society could impact that social-groups brain architecture. 

Some of the key structures include the Amygdala, within the frontal lobe; the Insular (Nagai 2007), Anterior and Cingulate Cortices (Courchesne 2008, Chiu 2008, Carter 2000), the cerebellum (Gao1996, Bower 2003) and the Hippocampus (Ebaldi 1980,Otsuka 1999), suggesting functional abnormalities, abnormal being not normal or like the average, sometimes more active sometimes less. As well as the genes associated with two major neurotransmitters (stimulating or inhibiting neural growth) GABA (Jamain 2002) and Glutamate (Ma 2005). These structures, functions and capabilities suggest unique qualities (or disturbances) in emotions, filtering and processing centers in the brain.  Such as the amygdala reacting adaptively; as in a larger amygdala (Mosconi 2009), a relevance indicator, compensating for the filtering activities of the Frontal Cortex. So abnormal, not in the normal way, but not necessarily abnormally wrong (Mehler 2009).  The same suggestion has been made for mitochondria function, while attributed to a more sensitive reaction to oxidative stress (environmental stressors), this lowered function ultimately serves an evolutionary purpose (Lapointe 2009). Along this adaptive function there is research to suggest both neurotransmitter and hormone uniqueness for unique qualities of these subsets of individuals. For example: Both dopamine and testosterone “uniqueness” is associated with ASD. Normal (average) dopamine levels create a “follow the crowd” reward system (Klucharev 2009), while less than average autoreceptors for dopamine creates a “novelty-seeking” reward system (Zald 2004) and a desire for exploration (Fisher 2009). And outside of normal (either high or low) testosterone levels creates “scientifically” minded individuals (Baron-Cohen 2009), while normal (average) testosterone levels create more “socially ” skilled individuals (Brosnan 2006). Francesca Happé of King’s College, London suggests that as many as 30% of autistic people have some sort of savant-like capability in areas such as calculation or music. Moreover, it is widely acknowledged that some of the symptoms associated with autism, including poor communication skills and an obsession with detail, are also exhibited by many creative types, particularly in the fields of science, engineering, music, drawing and painting.

Just like certain individuals are born athletically unique, typically with more or less fast or slow twitch muscle fibers, it could be similar in the brain. Most, or the average population (40%) would have a general combination of brain processing potentials, but the creative individual (60%) would have more specific processing potentials for a unique sensory experience of the world, usually receiving more information to process or processing the information from the senses in an atypical fashion (Casanova, Courchense) (sometimes called lateral thinking or fluid intelligence). 

So most people very effectively filter their environments to take in essential information, learn concepts quickly with limited information needed, deflect insults and emotional injury.  They become the core of society, salt of the earth, stable, even-keeled, social, and upstanding citizens. While some people do not filter information from their environment as effectively. These people receive more information from their environments. They live with more possibilities, a deeper/wider perspective of the world, they learn information more fundamentally, with a greater need for larger input to learn the same concepts, but learn it more intimately. They live in a world of greater possibilities, more options; visionaries, artists, scientists. 

Lesser Character Types.png

Could naturally occurring personality differences create a vulnerable subset of the population?

Different Function, Different Structure:

So while Kanner observed these differences and recognized the parents were of a literary, artistic or scientific nature, abstractions and details as their focused interests. He did not have the benefit of understanding WHAT made an individual more perceptually aware within their environment that would provide these natural and diverse attributes. (he assumed this distracted persona was the ‘cause’ at that time: aka, the refrigerator mother)

For this we needed the advancing research illuminating the unique sensory processing of these individuals; those “preoccupied with abstractions” susceptible to ASD and other forms of “mental illness” or as we once understood mental illness to be. 

They have more information available to them. But they may be more susceptible and vulnerable to the world without those efficient filters.

  • What are the basic functions that set them apart?
    • Attention: Detail. Focus and Diligence. Repetitive (RRBI) (Happe 2009)
    • Sensory awareness 
    • Fluid Intelligence and thought processing (Hayashi 2007)
    • Memory and action of emotions (De Martino 2008)

What is curious is how many “deficits” so closely relate to needed, useful and required behavioral traits for creativity, talent and genius.

The most striking observations (of how Autistic see themselves) were that all of them pointed out that unusual perceptions and information processing, as well as impairments in emotional regulation, were the core symptoms of autism, whereas the current classifications do not mention them.(Chamak2009)

Autistic traits seem to be qualities that would allow these subsets of the population to have an increased awareness of their surrounding environment, increased or altered perceptual awareness inherited and evolved from one generation to the next as an outlier or a peripheral mind. This natural variation for unique processing makes many if not slight, structural, functional and hormone/neurophysiologically unique.

These traits may also make them uniquely vulnerable to a very specific pattern of dysfunction. Which is why they can be so varied and almost polar opposite (a scientist vs an artist vs an athlete)…but still end up, at extremes, similarly dysfunctional  (Stimming, sensory social dysfunctions, hypersensitivity and emotional dysregulation). This may suggest that Aspergers, Autism, schizophrenia, bipolar, ADHD, PDD-NOS and personality disorders manifestations, variations on a tune. Similar initial conditions, multiple influences, variable but predictable outcomes; A Pattern

Three aspects of ASD

Perception & Sensory

1.) A wider view of reality would take longer and a more fundamental learning skill-set in order to file info into long-term memory. And when learning every aspect of a particular problem is required in order to resolve a condition, it’s easy to understand that in some cases it never happens, so the foundation of said subject never gets laid and built upon, or the child/adult lives their lives unresolved and in constant conflict/crisis mode. It could be hypothesized that the brain was set-up this way to finish thoughts started, to inspire or even demand for human to “figure things out” and all of these pathways serve a purpose, anger, frustration, obsession, compulsion, single-mindedness…starting a multitude of “branches”, more than the normal individual, gives their brains much more to do, more directions to follow, more information to take in…which could serve a purpose for the greater good, greater understanding, and a more diverse and expansive evolution potential. 

Nutrition & Resources

2.) Intense mental needs (equivalent to running mini-mental marathons on a daily basis) lead to intensely delicate balance of chemicals, requirements, recovery and restoration. Just as physical demands require additional provisions, so does mental demands, they actually require MORE energy and resources. The brain uses 20-30% of total calorie needs, up to 75% during infancy, (McCleary 2007) daily for “normal” functioning, the brain represent 2-3% of body weight, it also receives its energy from primarily glucose, unlike the body which can use either glucose or fat for energy. So living in the mind and especially when the mind is in overdrive, can be a drain on systems, resources and organs of the body. 

Social & Acceptance

3.) So what would happen to any child if they felt or knew they were fundamentally different and that being different would mean that they would not be understood or accepted, socially rejected or shunned? And the alternative, what would happen to any child if they spent their lives trying to fit in by being something they are not? Because this competition to be the best “normal” as possible, when that normal is defined by personality characteristics as opposed to value characteristics, causes emotional unrest in these individuals, when our values are on a personality preferences that they simply can never become. You cannot wish or train yourself into physiological personality characteristic & traits. The pain of social rejection is as real and runs the same neurophysiological pathways as physical pain.(Eisenberger 2004) And is sometime more damaging (Chen 2008).

People evolve for a multitude of purposes, our bodies are created to adapt and change. If the “geeks/artists/scientists” of the world are lacking filters or have other chemical uniqueness that allows them to live with more possibilities, than the biochemically individuality of these individuals may also set them up to be more environmentally sensitive or have compensatory actions, such as emotional sensitivity (different than norm) as a way to balance the influx of information.  

Community and Cooperation: Everyone is unique in their own way and we are finding patterns of similarities. We all have different potentials and different inborn skills. We are equal, needed, special and important to our community, our families, and the advancement of the human race. But there could be an evolutionary benefit to having a minority with variable neurophysiological experiences of the world… 

There could definitely be an evolutionary advantage to having “most” people being stable and social-oriented and a smaller subset of individuals as novelty-seekers, explorers and adventurers 

Lowering Nutrition Resources: Increasing Body Burden


It could be hypothesized that children develop the more distressing symptoms  of Autism from what could be any combination of stress or stressors from the environment as well as many other neurological and behavioral disorders, depending on the individual’s initial “starting point” and the combination and timing of environmental factors involved.  This stress would impede the ability to build neural pathways and the brain would then attempt to protect itself from excessive stimulation, more than what it can handle at the time, due to lack of and combination of resources needed. What the evidence seems to be suggesting is that our genetic or neurophysiological make-up, our responses to and our influences coming from the environment, the increases in our exposures to toxins that affect mineral balances (heavy metals), neurotoxins, inflammation (autoimmunity) and endocrine influencers (pesticides/hormones) could be creating a greater stress on the systems within particular populations. And quite possibly these populations, in evolutionary terms, could be ones that filter less of their sensory information, allowing them to be what some consider more “creative”, but the trade-off could be an increased susceptibility to dysfunction when the environment is not conducive to neural growth.  

The body/mind does not always distinguish one stressor from another, oxidation (Nobel), cytokines, cortisol, NMDA, peroxynitrite (Pall), glutamate, increase utilization of nutritional supplies all become engaged when the body must realign homeostasis, or prepare for action. Stress leads to neuroexcitation and depletion of resources. Any number of stressors will result in the same mobilization and utilization of resources. Nutritional and energy resources will be depleted accordingly and need to be replenished or risk failure to respond appropriately and timely to adversity. These depleted resources due to stressed environmental needs will no longer be available for cognitive function. -a unique sensitivity to stress: oxidation/mito, cortisol responses- Chronic stress weakens immune system, decreases  bone, impairs healing, impairs inoculation, risks recovery from minor to major incidents or procedures (OSU).

Pollution & Toxins

We are an intricate conglomeration of wiring, responses, compensations, and ever evolving dependence on our environment (Levitt). And environmental factors, such as pollution, chemicals, vaccines and illnesses will have the potential to impact our systems or create collateral damage through oxidative stress and overburdened systems.

“The human brain is a precious and vulnerable organ. And because optimal brain function depends on the integrity of the organ, even limited damage may have serious consequences,” says Philippe Grandjean , adjunct professor at Harvard School of Public Health and the study’s lead author.

A developing brain is much more susceptible to the toxic effects of chemicals than an adult brain. During development, the brain undergoes a highly complex series of processes at different stages. An interference—for example, from toxic substances—that disrupts those processes, can have permanent consequences. That vulnerability lasts from fetal development through infancy and childhood to adolescence. Research has shown that environmental toxicants, such as lead or mercury, at low levels of exposure can have subclinical effects—not clinically visible, but still important adverse effects, such as decreases in intelligence or changes in behavior. 

  • NonMonotonic Dose Response: Dose and timing is the poison. Lesser amounts greater effects.
  • Needed for processing/Detoxing of pollutants/chemicals: fats, antioxidants, energy, special qualities of herbs and plants like cilantro and mercury
  • Susceptibility of immune system, oxidative stress, mitochondria depletion….

Young children are potentially more susceptible to certain organophosphates for a longer period of time than previously thought,” said Brenda Eskenazi, UC Berkeley professor of epidemiology and director of CHAMACOS and the Center for Children’s Environmental Health Research. “Policymakers need to consider these vulnerable populations when establishing acceptable levels of exposure to different pesticides.”

Traits becoming dysfunction

From the cell’s point of view, I don’t think it matters. Am I oxidized because of an inflammation? Am I oxidized because I got mercury? I don’t care, I’m oxidized, I am in electron deficit. The data that I am hearing just keeps agreeing with that. Even this idea of astrogliosis and the white-matter tracks, when we take these oligodendrocyte progenitors and expose them to oxidative stress, they turn into astrocytes. So even that is a really intriguing outcome. We have to look at specific astrocyte populations there. (Nobel 2008)

Environmental vulnerability, neuroexciticity. NOBEL. PALL.

In utero and neonatal exposure to PCBs altered the development of brain cells in rats. (pessah). PCBs affected brain-cell circuits in the hippocampus, target of  PCBs, the calcium channels known as ryanodine receptors, and shows that PCBs lock these calcium channels in the open position, which likely contributes to the over-excitations of neural circuits observed in the two other studies. 

Decreased LI might therefore be regarded as advantageous, in that it allows for the perception of more unlikely, radical and numerous options for reconsideration, but disadvantageous in that the stressed or approach-oriented person risks ‘‘drowning in possibility,’’ to use Kierkegaard ’s phrase. 


  • -Heavy metals, pollutants create stress and increase nutritional needs and utilization.
  • -Nutrition needed for neural growth
  • -Why has it been missed?

The role of nutrition may be particularly important in order to build membranes – “and myelin is the ultimate membrane” (Bartzokis )- the body requires sufficient supplies of essential fatty acids found in fish oils, flaxseed, grains and nuts. But the diets of young people are notoriously poor, he says, and likely to be deficient in key nutrients. (Omega 3 studies. Why did science ignore the importance of fats (What if it’s all been a big fat lie-Taubes 2008)

Gomez-Piniella -It has long been suspected that the relative abundance of specific nutrients can affect cognitive processes and emotions. Newly described influences of dietary factors on neuronal function and synaptic plasticity have revealed some of the vital mechanisms that are responsible for the action of diet on brain health and mental function. Several gut hormones that can enter the brain, or that are produced in the brain itself, influence cognitive ability. In addition, well-established regulators of synaptic plasticity, such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor, can function as metabolic modulators, responding to peripheral signals such as food intake. Understanding the molecular basis of the effects of food on cognition will help us to determine how best to manipulate diet in order to increase the resistance of neurons to insults and promote mental fitness. 

A Tipping Point. An Information Overload. When does an adaptive trait create a vulnerability to a maladaptive dysfunction? The Autistic-Trait to the Autistic-Dysfunction.

Children having a genetic predisposition could make them more prone to environmental damage. A neuro-atypical individual, plus neurotoxic exposure could create greater and more pronounced neurophysiological dysfunction

What are these environmental influences that impact neural resources? How do chemicals impact the interactive and interdependent systems? :

Do they impact mitochondrial function? Do they impact glutamate or GABA (excitatory and inhibitory regulators of the brain)? Do they create cytokines (stress reaction)? Do they impact glutathione levels? Do they impact myelination? Dendrites? Calcium regulation? Do they create oxidation? Do they cause inflammation and autoimmunity? Does it impact genetic expression?

Spectrum disorders could be seen like weather patterns within a particular climates. It could make sense that this climate could be those who either receive more sensory information or are at unique critical developmental timelines when those challenges overwhelm them. This can be from any number of stressors that overburdened the body’s resources. When we lack the resources, energy, or nutrition to myelinate and create dendrites, when we over-excite the brain, the brain/nervous system will falter and instead devote its energy and focus to the “squeakiest wheel”…survival. Those children can’t build the sensory pathways from their experience of the world. They go into information overload. Removing these obstacles and either the body naturally, or with help, “recover” its balance and create natural improvement. The improvement of “symptoms” improves the ability for information to get through and processed. 

Autism is not caused by a single source

Orthodox medicine previously operated in a science that had absolute truths, hard science had such definable outcomes mechanisms, it was difficult not to be seduced by the simplicity

Physicists, such as David Bohm, have been warning us for decades that if we continued down a path of separatism and reductionism (foundations of orthodox medicine), we would end up with a crisis of our own creation, this “Crisis of Perception”. Systems thinkers believe the same, that not only are we blind to our problems using old methods of science, we are in fact creating them (Sterman 2002). Because of this limited view of the human body, we have ignored it’s interdependent systems and interactions in favor of simplicity and easier methods of “proof and repeatability”.

The art of medicine concentrates on diagnosis (finding problems) and treatment (fixing problems). The task of physicians might be described as “find it and fix it.” The find-it/fix-it model exemplifies what engineers call linear thinking. The linear model has been the predominant view of the world since the time of Sir Isaac Newton, who focused his attention on discrete components of the world and assumed that these components operated independently from one another. Many things work in a linear fashion. For a complex machine or organism, linear function means that each component operates independently of the others. The environment receives relatively little attention. In contrast to this linear thinking, a recent and more popular trend is toward “systems” thinking. Kaplan 2006:

Spectrum conditions as Deterministic Chaos Patterns

Autism is the first clear and concrete example or evidence of a disorder that can be delineated and modeled through the knowledge of advanced physics. This type of evidence has the potential to overturn or expand our current paradigm of orthodox medicine and the testing methods that it had depended on. 

Single source causation, reductionistic reasoning, and separate disorders.

Instead we have multiple influences creating variable, but predictable outcomes. The same insult can create unique results, and different insults can create the same result. This resembles a Systems Model. It will depend on the system that neural insults are put into that will create an outcome. In a sense, it’s the system itself causing the malfunction (Meadows 2008). Our body/mind compensating from neurotoxic events in the environment and availability of resources. 

No longer NATURE vs. NURTURE

There are many groups and advocates that are arguing their specific agendas, though many times pitted against one another, I believe they are fighting a common enemy; An outdated mode of scientific thinking.

Damage to a person’s mind. Whether it from heavy metals, chemicals, pesticides, insults, viruses, illness, deteriorating interactive systems of the body or deteriorating social systems. Damage to our minds, our bodies and our ability to function as a collective whole. It is hurting all of us. 

It may have been our well intentioned but misguidance of nutrition information, environmental influences (chemicals),  educational standardization (assumptions of normal) and our communities (competitiveness and comparisons) have created these unbalanced and unhealthy outcomes. Changing our understanding of the human body to an ecosystem scientific framework that interacts, is challenged and intimately influenced by our environment, nutrition, attitudes, economic motivations, community, and educational expectations will hopefully be accepted to guide our future endeavors and begin to correct our mistakes of the past.



University of Washington (2009, June 25). Changes In Brain Architecture May Be Driven By Different Cognitive Challenges. ScienceDaily. Retrieved June 26, 2009, from /releases/2009/06/090623165214.htm

Hertz-Picciotto I, Park HY, Dostal M, Kocan A, Trnovec T, Sram R Prenatal exposures to persistent and non-persistent organic compounds and effects on immune system developmentBasic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008 Feb;102(2):146-54

Grandjean P, Landrigan PJLancet Developmental neurotoxicity of industrial chemicals.2006 Dec 16;368(9553):2167-78.

Chen, Z., Williams, K. D., Fitness, J., & Newton, N. C. (2008).When hurt won’t heal: Exploring the capacity to relive social pain. Psychological Science, 19, 789-795.

Eisenberger NI and Lieberman MD. Why rejection hurts: A common neural alarm system for physical and social pain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 294-300, 2004

Hayashi M, Kato M, Igarashi K, Kashima H (2008) Superior fluid intelligence in children with Asperger’s disorder. Brain and Cognition 66:306-10. 

Andreasen, NC (1987). Creativity and mental illness: Prevalence rates in writers and their first-degree relatives. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1288-129222

Ludwig AM: Reflections on creativity and madness. Am J Psychotherapy, 1989; 43: 4-14 

Slotkin TA, Lassiter TL, Ryde IT, et al. Consumption of a high-fat diet in adulthood ameliorates the effects of neonatal parathion exposure on acetylcholine systems in rat brain regions. Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Jun;117(6):916-22. Epub 2009 Feb 3.

Slotkin TA, Wrench N, Ryde IT, Lassiter TL, Levin ED, Seidler FJ. Neonatal parathion exposure disrupts serotonin and dopamine synaptic function in rat brain regions: Modulation by a high-fat diet in adulthood. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2009 Jul 16. [Epub ahead of print]

Venerosi A, Ricceri L, Scattoni ML, Calamandrei G. Prenatal chlorpyrifos exposure alters motor behavior and ultrasonic vocalization in CD-1 mouse pups. Environ Health. 2009 Mar 30;8:12.

Howard AS, Fitzpatrick R, Pessah I, Kostyniak P, Lein PJ.  Polychlorinated biphenyls induce caspase-dependent cell death in cultured embryonic rat hippocampal but not cortical neurons via activation of the ryanodine receptor. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 190: 72-86, 2003.

Lapointe et al. Reversal of the Mitochondrial Phenotype and Slow Development of Oxidative Biomarkers of Aging in Long-lived Mclk1 /- Mice. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2009; 284 (30): 20364 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M109.006569

Hayashi M, Kato M, Igarashi K, Kashima H (2008) Superior fluid intelligence in children with Asperger’s disorder. Brain and Cognition 66:306-10.

De Martino B, Harrison NA, et al. Explaining enhanced logical consistency during decision making in autism. J Neurosci. 2008 Oct 15;28(42):10746-50

Harrison,N.A., Brydon,L., Walker,C., Gray,M.A., Steptoe,A., Critchley,H.D. (Forthcoming). Inflammation causes mood changes through alterations in subgenual cingulate activity and mesolimbic connectivity. Biological Psychiatry . ISSN: 0006-3223 

Chauhan A, Chauhan V, Brown WT, Cohen I. Oxidative stress in autism: increased lipid peroxidation and reduced serum levels of ceruloplasmin and transferrin–the antioxidant proteins. Life Sci. 2004 Oct 8;75(21):2539-49.

Schoderboeck L, Adzemovic M, Nicolussi EM, Crupinschi C, Hochmeister S, Fischer MT, Lassmann H, Bradl M. The “window of susceptibility” for inflammation in the immature central nervous system is characterized by a leaky blood-brain barrier and the local expression of inflammatory chemokinesNeurobiol Dis. 2009 Jun 9. [Epub ahead of print]

Grandin and Johnson (2004) Animals in Translation: Using the Mysteries of Autism to Decode Animal Behavior. Scribner. Grandin has likened autistic savant talents to the enhanced sensory and memory skills of animals

Baron-Cohen S, Auyeung B, Ashwin E, Knickmeyer R. Fetal testosterone and autistic traits: A response to three fascinating commentaries. Br J Psychol. 2009 Feb; 100(Pt 1):39-47

Brosnan MJ. Digit ratio and faculty membership: implications for the relationship between prenatal testosterone and academia. Br J Psychol. 2006 Nov; 97(Pt 4):455-66. 

Casanova MF, Buxhoeveden D, Gomez J (2003) Disruption in the inhibitory architecture of the cell minicolumn: implications for autisim. Neuroscientist 9:496-507. 

Crespi, BJ. (2008) Genomic imprinting in the development and evolution of psychotic spectrum conditions. Biological Reviews 83:441-493.

Crespi B. J. and C. Badcock (2008) Psychosis and autism as diametrical disorders of the social brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31: 284-320.

Courchesne E, Carper R, Akshoomoff N. Evidence of brain overgrowth in the first year of life in autism. JAMA. 2003;290:337–344.

Courchesne E, Pierce K. Why the frontal cortex in autism might be talking only to itself: local over-connectivity but long-distance disconnection. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2005;15(2):225-230. 

Dawson M, Soulières I, Gernsbacher MA, Mottron L (2007) The level and nature of autistic intelligence. Psychological Science 18:657-62 

Eigsti IM, Shapiro T. A systems neuroscience approach to autism: biological,

cognitive, and clinical perspectives. Ment Retard Dev Disabil. Res Rev 2003;9:205–15

Fisher HE, Aron A, Mashek D, Li H, Brown LL. Defining the brain systems of lust, romantic attraction, and attachment. Arch Sex Behav. 2002 Oct;31(5):413-9. 

Gogtay N, Sporn A, Clasen LS. Et al. Structural Brain MRI Abnormalities in Healthy Siblings of Patients With Childhood-Onset Schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2003 160: 569-571.  

Herbert MR. Autism: A Brain disorder or a disorder that affects the brain? Clinical Neuropsychiatry  2005; 2(6):354-79.

Hayashi M, Kato M, Igarashi K, Kashima H (2008) Superior fluid intelligence in children with Asperger’s disorder. Brain and Cognition 66:306-10. 

Insel, T.R., Fenton, W.S. (2005). Psychiatric Epidemiology: It’s Not Just About Counting Anymore. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 590-592.

Jamain S, Betancur C, Quach H. Linkage and association of the glutamate receptor 6 gene with autism. 2002, Volume 7, Number 3, Pages 302-310

Judson MC, Bergman MY, Campbell DB, Dynamic gene and protein expression patterns of the autism-associated Met receptor tyrosine kinase in the developing mouse forebrain. J Comp Neurol. 2009 Apr 10;513(5):511-31. 

Zhang K, Zheng Z, Gao X. Possible Relationship between the COMT Gene Vel158 Met Polymorphism and Psychometric IQ in Girls of the Qinba Region in China. Neuropsychobiology 2007;56:98-103 (DOI: 10.1159/000112950). 

Klucharev V, Hytönen K, Rijpkema M. Reinforcement learning signal predicts social conformity. Neuron. 2009 Jan 15;61(1):140-51

Ma DQ, Whitehead PL, Menold MM,Pericak-Vance MA. Identification of significant association and gene-gene interaction on GABA receptor subunit genes in autism. Am J Hum Genet 2005 Sep;77(3):377-88.

Nagai M, Kishi K, Kato S. Insular cortex and neuropsychiatric disorders: a review of recent literature. Eur Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;22(6):387-94. Epub 2007 Apr 9

Duke University Medical Center (2005, August 3). Complex Gene Interactions Account For Autism Risk. ScienceDaily. Retrieved December 30, 2008, from /releases/2005/08/050803063300.htm

Peterson, JB, & Carson, S. (2000). Latent inhibition and openness to experience in a high-achieving student population. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 323-332.

O’Riordan MA, Plaisted KC, Driver J, Baron-Cohen S (2001) Superior visual search in autism. Journal of Experimental Psychology 27:719-3

Shaw P, Eckstrand K, Sharp W, et al. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is characterized by a delay in cortical maturation. PNAS, 2007 104:19649-19654. doi:10.1073/pnas.0707741104

Brain Matures a Few Years Later but at normal Pace for ADHD

Stanford University Medical Center (2005, November 9). Children Of Bipolar Parents Score Higher On Creativity Test, Stanford Study Finds. ScienceDaily. Retrieved March 27, 2009, from /releases/2005/11/051109092005.htm

Thompson PM, Cannon TD, Narr KL, et al. Genetic influences on brain structure Nature Neuroscience  4, 1253 – 1258 (2001) Published online: 5 November 2001; | doi:10.1038/nn758. 

Trottier G, Srivastava, Walker CD. Etiology of infantile autism: a review of recent advances and neurobiological research. J Psychiatry neurosci. 1999Mar;24(2):103-115. 

Wellcome Trust (2008, October 15). People With Autism Make More Rational Decisions, Study Shows. ScienceDaily. Retrieved December 7, 2008, from /releases/2008/10/081015110228.htm

Zald DH, Cowan RL, Riccardi P. Midbrain dopamine receptor availability is inversely associated with novelty-seeking traits in humans. J Neurosci. 2008 Dec 31;28(53):14372-8. PMID: 19118170


Bartzokis G, Lu PH, Mintz J. Quantifying age-related myelin breakdown with MRI: novel therapeutic targets for preventing cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2004;6(6 suppl):S53-S59. 

Gershon MD (July 1999). The enteric nervous system: a second brain. Hosp Pract (Minneap) 34 (7): 31–2, 35–8, 41–2 passim

Gómez-Pinilla, F. Brain foods: the effects of nutrients on brain function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9, 568-578 (2008).  

Improved mood and behavior during treatment with a mineral-vitamin supplement: an open-label case series of children. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology. Spring 2004; 14(1):115-22.

Jaenisch R and Bird A. (2003) Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat. Genet. 33 (Suppl) 245-254.

Liu J, Raine, A. The effect of childhood malnutrition on externalizing behavior. 2006 Oct;18(5):565-70. 

Mcleary, L. (2007) The Brain Trust Program. A Perigree Book; Penguin Group.

Taken from

Rice, S. Barone, D.Jr. Critical periods of vulnerability for the developing nervous system: evidence from humans and animal models. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 June; 108(Suppl 3): 511–533. 

Nemets, H. et al., Omega-3 helps depressed children, A Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Study. Am J Psychiatry 2006; 163:1098–1100 

Peet, Stokes. A review of the current evidence (2005) suggests that essential fatty acids, particularly EPA and DHA may benefit a variety of mental health conditions. Drugs, 65(8):1051-9, 2005 

Prasad AS, Mantzoros CS Beck FW. Zinc status and serum testosterone levels of healthy adults. Nutrition. 1996 May;12(5):344-8. 

Pollock B, Machin KL. Effects of cadmium, mercury, and selenium on reproductive indices in male lesser scaup (Aythya affinis) in the western Boreal forest. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2008 May;54(4):730-9.

Richardson, M. Supplements of omega-3 and omega-6 improve reading, spelling and behaviour in children ages 5-12 years with Developmental Coordination Disorder. Pediatrics, 115(5):1360-6, 2005.

Pinilla FG. The impact of diet and exercise on brain plasticity and disease. Nutr Health. 2006;18(3):277-84. 

Rice S, Barone D.Jr. Critical periods of vulnerability for the developing nervous system: evidence from humans and animal models. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 June; 108(Suppl 3): 511–533. 

Rumsey J, Rappaport J. Assessing behavioral and cognitive effects of diet in pediatric populations. In: Wurtman R, Wurtman J, editors. Nutrition and the brain, vol. 6. Raven Press; 1983. p. 101–62. 

Small GW, Silverman DH, Siddarth P, et al. Effects of a 14-day healthy longevity lifestyle program on cognition and brain function. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 Jun;14(6):538-45.

Sowa-Kucma M, Legutko B, Szewczyk B, et al. Antidepressant-like activity of zinc: further behavioral and molecular evidence. Smetna 12, 31-343, Kraków, Poland.J Neural Transm. 2008 Sep 3

Yasuhiro Y,  Hideki F, Masayoshi I. Suppressive Effect of Zinc on the Toxicity of Mercury Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin Vol.25, No.7(19770725) pp. 1509-1518 

ASSAULTS to interactive systems affecting neural growth

Blaylock RL. The central role of excitotoxicity in autism spectrum disorders. JANA. 2003;6:7-19.

Blaylock RL. A possible central mechanism in autism spectrum disorders, part 2: immunoexcitotoxicity. Altern Ther Health Med. 2009 Jan-Feb;15(1):60-7.

Brown JS, Jr. Effects of Bisphenol-A and Other Endocrine Disruptors Compared With Abnormalities of Schizophrenia: An Endocrine-Disruption Theory of Schizophrenia. DOI 10.1093/schbul/sbm147. Schizophr Bull 35: 256-278. 

D’Amelio M et al Paraoxonase gene variants are associated with autism in North America, but not in Italy: possible regional specificity in gene-environment interactions. Mol Psychiatry. 2005 Nov;10(11):1006-16.

Deth R et al.  How environmental and genetic factors combine to cause autism: A redox/methylation hypothesis. Neurotoxicology. 2008 Jan;29(1):190-201.

Durkin MS, Maenner MJ, Newschaffer CJ. Advanced Parental Age and the Risk of Autism Spectrum Disorder. American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access published on December 1, 2008, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwn250. Am. J. Epidemiol. 168: 1268-1276. 

Han, R. Yang, Y.M., Dietrich, J., Luebke, A., Mayer-Pröschel, M. and Noble, M. (2008) Systemic 5-fluorouracil treatment causes a syndrome of delayed myelin destruction in the CNS. J. Biol. 7:12 link 

Kern, JK, Jones, AM. Evidence of Toxicity, oxidative stress and neuronal Insult. Autism Pathophysiology, 13 (2006) 171–181. 

James, JS, Cutler, P, Melnyk, S. Metabolic biomarkers of increased oxidative stress and impaired methylation capacity in children with autism. Am J Clin Nutr 2004 80: 1611-1617. 

James SJ, Melnyk S, Jernigan S, Metabolic endophenotype and related genotypes are associated with oxidative stress in children with autism. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2006 Dec 5;141B(8):947-56. 

James SJ, Rose S, Melnyk S, et al. Cellular and mitochondrial glutathione redox imbalance in lymphoblastoid cells derived from children with autism. FASEB J. 2009 Mar 23. 

Jyonouchi H, Sun S, Le H. Proinflammatory and regulatory cytokine production associated with innate and adaptive immune responses in children with autism spectrum disorders

and developmental regression. J Neuroimmun.2001;20(1-2):170-179

Kronfol Z, Remick DG. Cytokines and the Brain: Implications for Clinical Psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry. 2000 May 1;157(5):683-694. 

Larsson M, Weiss B, Janson S, et al. Associations between indoor environmental factors and parental-reported autistic spectrum disorders in children 6–8 years of age. NeuroToxicology, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 10 February 2009. doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2009.01.011   

Lathe R. Environmental Factors and Limbic Vulnerability in Childhood Autism. American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology 4 (2): 183-197, 2008. ISSN 1553-3468

Minami T, Miyata E, Sakamoto Y, Yamazaki H, Ichida S. Induction of metallothionein in mouse cerebellum and cerebrum with low-dose thimerosal injection. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2009 Apr 9. 

Nataf, R,. Skorupka, C, Amet, L.  Porphyrinuria in Childhood Autistic Disorder: Implications for Environmental Toxicity. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 214 (2006) 99–108.

Nunez AA, Kannan K, Giesy JP, Et al. Effects of Bisphenol A on energy balance and accumulateon in brown adipose tissue in rats.Chemosphere, Volume 42, Issue 8, 15 March 2001, Pages 917-922

Schulz JB, Lindenau J, Seyfried J, Dichgans J. Glutathione, oxidative stress and neurodegeneration. Eur J Biochem 2000;267:4904 –11.

Shultz SR, Macfabe DF, Martin S, Intracerebroventricular injections of the enteric bacterial metabolic product propionic acid impair cognition and sensorimotor ability in the Long-Evans rat: further development of a rodent model of autism. Behav Brain Res. 2009 Jun 8;200(1):33-41. Epub 2008 Dec 30. 

Singh VK, et al.  Antibodies to myelin basic protein in children with autistic disorder. Brain Behavior and Immunity 7: 97-103 (1997). 

Singh VK. Neuro-immunopathogenesis in autism. In: NeuroImmune Biology: New Foundation of Biology, Vol. 1: 443-454 (2001) 

Otsuka H, Harada M, Mori K, Hisaoka S, Nishitani H. brain metabolites in the hippocampus-amygdala region and cerebellum in autism: an 1H-MR spectroscopy study. Neuroradiol.1999;41:517-519

Weissman JR, Kelley RI, Bauman ML, Cohen BH, Murray KF, et al. 2008 Mitochondrial Disease in Autism Spectrum Disorder Patients: A Cohort Analysis. PLoS ONE 3(11): e3815 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003815 

Howlin P,Goode S, Hutton J,  Rutter M. Savant skills in autism: psychometric approaches and parental reports. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B May 27, 2009 364:1359-1367; doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0328

Vital PM, Ronald A, Wallace GL, Happé F. Relationship between special abilities and autistic-like traits in a large population-based sample of 8-year-olds. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry for Child and Adolescent Mental Health 2009. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02076.x

Baron-Cohen S, Ashwin E, Ashwin C, Tavassoli T, Chakrabarti B.Talent in autism: hyper-systemizing, hyper-attention to detail and sensory hypersensitivityPhil. Trans. R. Soc. B May 27, 2009 364:1377-1383; doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0337

Frith CD, Frith U. The self and its reputation in autism. Neuron. 2008 Feb 7;57(3):331-2. 

Murali KS, Ramanathan G. A new spectrum of personality disorders?

The British Journal of Psychiatry (2008) 192: 233. doi: 10.1192/bjp.192.3.233

A basic structural abnormality in the frontal cortex might cause these individuals to have higher psychiatric comorbidity (not only of ASPD and SSPD) and the abnormal characteristics identified might not be entirely explained by the co-occurrence of these two disorders. The authors have rightly identified that the results could not merely be due to the additive effects of both disorders, but that the increased prevalence of personality disorder in the study population might be due to a common confounder that does not lie on the causal pathway between ASPD/SSPD and abnormality in characteristics. 

Association for Psychological Science (2009, July 19). The Fancier The Cortex, The Smarter The Brain?. ScienceDaily. Retrieved August 8, 2009, from /releases/2009/07/090717104623.htm

Carter CS, Macdonald A, Botvinick M, et al. Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97:1944–1948

Chiu PH, Kayali MA, Kishida KT. Self responses along cingulate cortex reveal quantitative neural phenotype for high-functioning autism. Neuron. 2008 Feb 7;57(3):463-73

Courchesne E, Pierce K. Why the frontal cortex in autism might be talking only to itself: local over-connectivity but long-distance disconnection. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2005;15(2):225-230. Increased local but reduced long-distance cortical-cortical reciprocal activity and coupling would impair the fundamental frontal function of integrating information from widespread and diverse systems and providing complex context-rich feedback, guidance and control to lower-level systems.

Gao J, Parsons LM, James M. Bower. Cerebellum Implicated in Sensory Acquisition and Discrimination Rather Than Motor Control. Science 26 April 1996: Vol. 272. no. 5261, pp. 545 – 547. DOI: 10.1126/science.272.5261.545. Recent evidence that the cerebellum is involved in perception and cognition challenges the prevailing view that its primary function is fine motor control. A new alternative hypothesis is that the lateral cerebellum is not activated by the control of movement per se, but is strongly engaged during the acquisition and discrimination of sensory information. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lateral cerebellar output (dentate) nucleus during passive and active sensory tasks confirmed this hypothesis. These findings suggest that the lateral cerebellum may be active during motor, perceptual, and cognitive performances specifically because of the requirement to process sensory data.

Bower JM, Parsons LM. Rethinking the “lesser brain”. Sci Am. 2003 Aug;289(2):50-7. Other findings indicate that the cerebellum may play important roles in shortterm memory, attention, impulse control, emotion, higher cognition, the ability to schedule and plan tasks, and possibly even in conditions such as schizophrenia and autism. Additional neurobiological experiments-both on the pattern of sensory inputs to the cerebellum and on the ways in which the cerebellum processes that information-also suggest a need to substantially revise current thinking about the function of this organ

Otsuka H, Harada M, Mori K, Hisaoka S, Nishitani H. Brain metabolites in the hippocampus-amygdala region and cerebellum in autism: an 1H-MR spectroscopy study. Neuroradiol.1999;41:517-519ONISAWA Takehisa. MDAI 2005 : modeling decisions for artificial intelligence : (Tsukuba, 25-27 July 2005 ) Modeling decisions for artificial intelligence. International conference No2, Tsukuba , JAPON (25/07/2005) 

2005  , vol. 3558, pp. 36-46[Note(s) : XII, 468 p., ] [Document : 11 p.] (11 ref.) ISBN 3-540-27871-0

Kaplan RM, Porzsolt F, Optimizing Health: Improving the Value of Healthcare Delivery. Springer US. 2006. 10.1007/978-0-387-33921-4_2

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s